A structured recovery mandate for trials that are slow, unstable, misaligned or no longer protecting the development thesis.
The problem
Enrollment plans drift, sites behave differently from feasibility assumptions, vendor reports do not clarify decisions and quality signals surface too late. Recovery requires diagnosis of the system, not more pressure on isolated metrics.
What we do
Best fit
WHAT CHANGES AFTER THE ENGAGEMENT
BEFORE
Recruitment, country and site performance, vendor behaviour and quality signals were drifting without one diagnosis of the underlying system.
INTERVENTION
Feasibility, country and site mix, activation cadence, vendor oversight, RBQM, escalation and sponsor decision rights were reconnected to the intended readout.
WHAT CHANGED
The sponsor regained a controlled recruitment and governance cadence with earlier visibility of site, vendor and quality deviations.
VALUE PROTECTED
Recovery was governed around signal integrity and interpretability rather than activity volume or calendar pressure alone.
Related
A decision-grade next step
The recovery plan must protect decision value, not only the calendar.